↓ Skip to main content

Real-Time Strategy Game Training: Emergence of a Cognitive Flexibility Trait

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS ONE, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
32 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
twitter
352 tweeters
facebook
55 Facebook pages
googleplus
42 Google+ users
reddit
7 Redditors
video
6 video uploaders

Citations

dimensions_citation
109 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
379 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Real-Time Strategy Game Training: Emergence of a Cognitive Flexibility Trait
Published in
PLoS ONE, August 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0070350
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brian D. Glass, W. Todd Maddox, Bradley C. Love

Abstract

Training in action video games can increase the speed of perceptual processing. However, it is unknown whether video-game training can lead to broad-based changes in higher-level competencies such as cognitive flexibility, a core and neurally distributed component of cognition. To determine whether video gaming can enhance cognitive flexibility and, if so, why these changes occur, the current study compares two versions of a real-time strategy (RTS) game. Using a meta-analytic Bayes factor approach, we found that the gaming condition that emphasized maintenance and rapid switching between multiple information and action sources led to a large increase in cognitive flexibility as measured by a wide array of non-video gaming tasks. Theoretically, the results suggest that the distributed brain networks supporting cognitive flexibility can be tuned by engrossing video game experience that stresses maintenance and rapid manipulation of multiple information sources. Practically, these results suggest avenues for increasing cognitive function.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 352 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 379 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 2%
Spain 3 <1%
France 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Other 8 2%
Unknown 350 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 78 21%
Student > Bachelor 65 17%
Student > Master 62 16%
Researcher 53 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 27 7%
Other 65 17%
Unknown 29 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 148 39%
Computer Science 39 10%
Social Sciences 32 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 5%
Neuroscience 17 4%
Other 75 20%
Unknown 48 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 648. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2021.
All research outputs
#17,541
of 17,617,388 outputs
Outputs from PLoS ONE
#316
of 165,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100
of 167,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS ONE
#6
of 3,891 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,617,388 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 165,892 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,010 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,891 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.