↓ Skip to main content

The complexity of NF-κB signaling in inflammation and cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Cancer, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
6 X users
patent
3 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
2542 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2087 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The complexity of NF-κB signaling in inflammation and cancer
Published in
Molecular Cancer, August 2013
DOI 10.1186/1476-4598-12-86
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bastian Hoesel, Johannes A Schmid

Abstract

The NF-κB family of transcription factors has an essential role in inflammation and innate immunity. Furthermore, NF-κB is increasingly recognized as a crucial player in many steps of cancer initiation and progression. During these latter processes NF-κB cooperates with multiple other signaling molecules and pathways. Prominent nodes of crosstalk are mediated by other transcription factors such as STAT3 and p53 or the ETS related gene ERG. These transcription factors either directly interact with NF-κB subunits or affect NF-κB target genes. Crosstalk can also occur through different kinases, such as GSK3-β, p38, or PI3K, which modulate NF-κB transcriptional activity or affect upstream signaling pathways. Other classes of molecules that act as nodes of crosstalk are reactive oxygen species and miRNAs. In this review, we provide an overview of the most relevant modes of crosstalk and cooperativity between NF-κB and other signaling molecules during inflammation and cancer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,087 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 <1%
United Kingdom 7 <1%
Brazil 4 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Chile 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Russia 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Other 17 <1%
Unknown 2038 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 505 24%
Student > Bachelor 300 14%
Student > Master 292 14%
Researcher 196 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 129 6%
Other 257 12%
Unknown 408 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 497 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 469 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 252 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 103 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 103 5%
Other 180 9%
Unknown 483 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,700,079
of 25,483,400 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Cancer
#96
of 1,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,372
of 210,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Cancer
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,483,400 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,927 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,063 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.