↓ Skip to main content

Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus neutralising serum antibodies in dromedary camels: a comparative serological study

Overview of attention for article published in Lancet Infectious Diseases, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#11 of 3,590)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
59 news outlets
blogs
10 blogs
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
285 tweeters
patent
2 patents
facebook
11 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
355 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
208 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus neutralising serum antibodies in dromedary camels: a comparative serological study
Published in
Lancet Infectious Diseases, October 2013
DOI 10.1016/s1473-3099(13)70164-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chantal BEM Reusken, Bart L Haagmans, Marcel A Müller, Carlos Gutierrez, Gert-Jan Godeke, Benjamin Meyer, Doreen Muth, V Stalin Raj, Laura Smits-De Vries, Victor M Corman, Jan-Felix Drexler, Saskia L Smits, Yasmin E El Tahir, Rita De Sousa, Janko van Beek, Norbert Nowotny, Kees van Maanen, Ezequiel Hidalgo-Hermoso, Berend-Jan Bosch, Peter Rottier, Albert Osterhaus, Christian Gortázar-Schmidt, Christian Drosten, Marion PG Koopmans

Abstract

A new betacoronavirus-Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV)-has been identified in patients with severe acute respiratory infection. Although related viruses infect bats, molecular clock analyses have been unable to identify direct ancestors of MERS-CoV. Anecdotal exposure histories suggest that patients had been in contact with dromedary camels or goats. We investigated possible animal reservoirs of MERS-CoV by assessing specific serum antibodies in livestock.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 285 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 197 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 40 19%
Student > Master 35 17%
Student > Bachelor 30 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 13%
Unspecified 18 9%
Other 57 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 79 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 45 22%
Unspecified 25 12%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 19 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 15 7%
Other 25 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 827. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2018.
All research outputs
#5,563
of 13,118,812 outputs
Outputs from Lancet Infectious Diseases
#11
of 3,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45
of 153,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lancet Infectious Diseases
#1
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,118,812 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,590 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 153,957 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.