↓ Skip to main content

Routine parallel diagnosis of malaria using microscopy and the malaria rapid diagnostic test SD 05FK60: the experience of Médecins Sans Frontières in Myanmar

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Routine parallel diagnosis of malaria using microscopy and the malaria rapid diagnostic test SD 05FK60: the experience of Médecins Sans Frontières in Myanmar
Published in
Malaria Journal, May 2013
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-12-167
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cara S Kosack, Wint Thu Naing, Erwan Piriou, Leslie Shanks

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are commonly used in Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF) programmes to detect acute malaria infection. Programmes in regions with both Plasmodium falciparum and non-falciparum malaria (i.e. Plasmodium ovale, Plasmodium malariae and Plasmodium vivax) use a three-band P. falciparum/Pan test such as the SD Bioline Malaria Ag P.f/Pan 05FK60 (Standard Diagnostics, Kyonggi, Republic of Korea), hereafter referred to as SD 05FK60, as used by the MSF-Holland clinics in Rakhine state, Myanmar. In spite of published reports of generally good test performance, medical and paramedical staff on the ground often doubt the diagnostic accuracy of these RDTs. METHODS: Parallel testing with malaria microscopy and RDT was conducted at two clinics in Rakhine state, Myanmar, for a period of 14 months as a programmatic response due to doubts and concerns of medical and paramedical staff into malaria RDTs. RESULTS: A total of 2,585 blood samples from non-pregnant suspected malaria patients were examined by the SD 05FK60 RDT and microscopy at two clinics in Myanmar from October 2010 to December 2011. The reference standard microscopy diagnosed 531 P. falciparum and 587 P. vivax or P. malariae mono-infections. The overall sensitivity for P. falciparum detection by the SD 05FK60 was 90.2% (95% CI: 87.4-92.6) and for P. vivax/P. malariae 79.4% (95% CI: 75.9-82.6). The overall specificity for P. falciparum detection by the SD 05FK60 was 98.5% (95% CI: 97.7-99.1) and for P. vivax/P. malariae 98.7% (95% CI: 97.9-99.2). The sensitivity for P. falciparum was >91% for parasitaemia levels of >100-1,000 parasites/mul and increased for P. vivax/P. malariae with the parasitaemia level but was overall lower than for P. falciparum.25/408 and 13/420 cases, respectively, of P. falciparum and non-falciparum malaria were missed by the RDT. CONCLUSION: In field conditions in Myanmar, the SD 05FK60 malaria RDT performed consistent with other reports. The test detected malaria caused by P. vivax/P. malariae to a lesser extent than P. falciparum infection. Sensitivity improved with increasing parasitaemia level, however even at higher levels some infections were missed. The SD 05FK60 is adequate for use in settings where high quality microscopy is not available.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Tanzania, United Republic of 2 2%
Nigeria 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 101 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 20%
Researcher 19 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Student > Postgraduate 8 8%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Other 17 16%
Unknown 23 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Other 17 16%
Unknown 25 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2016.
All research outputs
#6,927,055
of 22,715,151 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#2,126
of 5,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,310
of 195,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#32
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,715,151 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,547 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,536 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.