↓ Skip to main content

A comparison of complex sleep behaviors with two short-acting Z-hypnosedative drugs in nonpsychotic patients

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A comparison of complex sleep behaviors with two short-acting Z-hypnosedative drugs in nonpsychotic patients
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, August 2013
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s48152
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nian-Sheng Tzeng, Li-Fen Chen, Ching-En Lin, Yu-Ching Chou, Wai-Chung Mao, Yi Chyan Chen

Abstract

Complex sleep behaviors (CSBs) are classified as "parasomnias" in the International Classifcation of Sleep Disorders, Second Edition (ICSD-2). To realize the potential danger after taking two short-acting Z-hypnosedative drugs, we estimated the incidence of CSBs in nonpsychotic patients in Taiwan.

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 11%
Student > Master 3 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 9 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 19%
Neuroscience 3 11%
Psychology 2 7%
Unspecified 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 13 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2023.
All research outputs
#3,878,437
of 23,666,107 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#546
of 3,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,786
of 200,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#9
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,666,107 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,042 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,104 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.