↓ Skip to main content

Potential impact of new oral anticoagulants on the management of atrial fibrillation-related stroke in primary care.

Overview of attention for article published in International journal of clinical practice, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Potential impact of new oral anticoagulants on the management of atrial fibrillation-related stroke in primary care.
Published in
International journal of clinical practice, April 2013
DOI 10.1111/ijcp.12177
Pubmed ID
Authors

Harris K, Mant J, Harris, K., Mant, J., K. Harris, J. Mant

Abstract

Anticoagulant prophylaxis with vitamin K antagonists (such as warfarin) is effective in reducing the risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). New oral anticoagulants have emerged as potential alternatives to traditional oral agents. The purpose of this review was to summarise the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban, dabigatran and apixaban in stroke prevention in patients with AF in phase III trials, evaluate their cost-effectiveness and consider the implications for primary care.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 1%
Slovenia 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 67 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 28%
Researcher 13 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Unspecified 5 7%
Other 17 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 61%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 11%
Unspecified 7 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 4%
Mathematics 2 3%
Other 8 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2013.
All research outputs
#1,428,147
of 7,435,338 outputs
Outputs from International journal of clinical practice
#203
of 941 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,357
of 125,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International journal of clinical practice
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,435,338 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 941 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,444 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them