You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Methods, February 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nmeth.4193 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shawn Q Zheng, Eugene Palovcak, Jean-Paul Armache, Kliment A Verba, Yifan Cheng, David A Agard |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 17% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 8% |
| Finland | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 7 | 58% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 42% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,536 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1535 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 374 | 24% |
| Researcher | 247 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 152 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 129 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 78 | 5% |
| Other | 155 | 10% |
| Unknown | 401 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 648 | 42% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 222 | 14% |
| Chemistry | 61 | 4% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 26 | 2% |
| Engineering | 23 | 1% |
| Other | 123 | 8% |
| Unknown | 433 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#738,691
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#962
of 5,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,308
of 329,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#25
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,401 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,864 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.