↓ Skip to main content

Systematic review and meta-analysis for the use of ultrasound versus radiology in diagnosing of pneumonia

Overview of attention for article published in The Ultrasound Journal, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
19 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
278 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
123 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
284 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Systematic review and meta-analysis for the use of ultrasound versus radiology in diagnosing of pneumonia
Published in
The Ultrasound Journal, February 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13089-017-0059-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Saeed Ali Alzahrani, Majid Abdulatief Al-Salamah, Wedad Hussain Al-Madani, Mahmoud A. Elbarbary

Abstract

Physicians are increasingly using point of care lung ultrasound (LUS) for diagnosing pneumonia, especially in critical situations as it represents relatively easy and immediately available tool. They also used it in many associated pathological conditions such as consolidation, pleural effusion, and interstitial syndrome with some reports of more accuracy than chest X-ray. This systematic review and meta-analysis are aimed to estimate the pooled diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for the diagnosis of pneumonia versus the standard chest radiological imaging. A systematic literature search was conducted for all published studies comparing the diagnostic accuracy of LUS against a reference Chest radiological exam (C X-ray or Chest computed Tomography CT scan), combined with clinical criteria for pneumonia in all age groups. Eligible studies were required to have a Chest X-ray and/or CT scan at the time of clinical evaluation. The authors extracted qualitative and quantitative information from eligible studies, and calculated pooled sensitivity and specificity and pooled positive/negative likelihood ratios (LR). Twenty studies containing 2513 subjects were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled estimates for lung ultrasound in the diagnosis of pneumonia were, respectively, as follows: Overall pooled sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of pneumonia by lung ultrasound were 0.85 (0.84-0.87) and 0.93 (0.92-0.95), respectively. Overall pooled positive and negative LRs were 11.05 (3.76-32.50) and 0.08 (0.04-0.15), pooled diagnostic Odds ratio was 173.64 (38.79-777.35), and area under the pooled ROC (AUC for SROC) was 0.978. Point of care lung ultrasound is an accurate tool for the diagnosis of pneumonia. Considering being easy, readily availability, low cost, and free from radiological hazards, it can be considered as important diagnostic strategy in this condition.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 278 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 284 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 282 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 42 15%
Researcher 34 12%
Student > Postgraduate 26 9%
Student > Master 24 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 7%
Other 74 26%
Unknown 64 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 167 59%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 4%
Engineering 5 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 1%
Computer Science 4 1%
Other 20 7%
Unknown 72 25%