↓ Skip to main content

The interaction between gut microbiota and age-related changes in immune function and inflammation

Overview of attention for article published in Immunity & Ageing, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
186 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The interaction between gut microbiota and age-related changes in immune function and inflammation
Published in
Immunity & Ageing, August 2013
DOI 10.1186/1742-4933-10-31
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thea Magrone, Emilio Jirillo

Abstract

Intestinal microbiota and gut immune systems interact each other, maintaining a condition of homeostasis in the context of the intestinal habitat. However, both systems undergo modifications in elderly, thus accounting for a low grade inflammatory status which, in turn, may evolve toward more severe pathological conditions such as inflammatory bowel disease and colon rectal cancer. In addition, in western societies dietary habits may negatively influence the microbiota composition, also altering gut immune response which is per se impaired in elderly. In order to prevent the outcome of aged-related disease, supplementation of nutraceuticals able to correct abnormalities of both immune system and microbiota has become more frequent than in the past. In this respect, a better identification of components of the aged microbiota as well as a deeper analysis of gut mucosal immunity function should be pursued.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 177 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 41 22%
Student > Bachelor 30 16%
Student > Master 23 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 10%
Student > Postgraduate 8 4%
Other 40 22%
Unknown 25 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 52 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 33 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 14 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 4%
Other 28 15%
Unknown 32 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2020.
All research outputs
#4,538,327
of 22,716,996 outputs
Outputs from Immunity & Ageing
#112
of 370 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,602
of 197,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Immunity & Ageing
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,716,996 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 370 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,504 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.