↓ Skip to main content

Facial Changes Caused by Smoking: A Comparison Between Smoking and Non-smoking Identical Twins.

Overview of attention for article published in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 5,522)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
81 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
twitter
496 tweeters
facebook
139 Facebook pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users
reddit
5 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Facial Changes Caused by Smoking: A Comparison Between Smoking and Non-smoking Identical Twins.
Published in
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, August 2013
DOI 10.1097/prs.0b013e3182a4c20a
Pubmed ID
Authors

Okada HC, Alleyne B, Varghai K, Kinder K, Guyuron B, Okada, Haruko C., Alleyne, Brendan, Varghai, Kaveh, Kinder, Kimberly, Guyuron, Bahman

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify the specific components of facial aging secondary to smoking, by comparing standardized photographs of identical twins with different smoking histories.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 496 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 9%
United Kingdom 2 4%
Brazil 1 2%
Czech Republic 1 2%
PR 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 41 77%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 21%
Student > Master 8 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Professor 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Other 17 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 47%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Computer Science 2 4%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 10 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1121. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2018.
All research outputs
#1,875
of 9,698,027 outputs
Outputs from Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
#1
of 5,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26
of 134,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
#1
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 9,698,027 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,522 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 134,035 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.