↓ Skip to main content

Facial Changes Caused by Smoking: A Comparison Between Smoking and Non-smoking Identical Twins.

Overview of attention for article published in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 5,021)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
79 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
481 tweeters
facebook
139 Facebook pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users
reddit
5 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Facial Changes Caused by Smoking: A Comparison Between Smoking and Non-smoking Identical Twins.
Published in
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, August 2013
DOI 10.1097/prs.0b013e3182a4c20a
Pubmed ID
Authors

Okada HC, Alleyne B, Varghai K, Kinder K, Guyuron B, Okada, Haruko C., Alleyne, Brendan, Varghai, Kaveh, Kinder, Kimberly, Guyuron, Bahman

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify the specific components of facial aging secondary to smoking, by comparing standardized photographs of identical twins with different smoking histories.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 481 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 9%
Unknown 10 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 18%
Other 2 18%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 18%
Student > Master 1 9%
Professor 1 9%
Other 3 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 18%
Unspecified 1 9%
Psychology 1 9%
Other 2 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1089. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2017.
All research outputs
#1,331
of 7,930,153 outputs
Outputs from Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
#1
of 5,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21
of 127,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
#1
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,930,153 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,021 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,623 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.