You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
'Mediterranean' dietary pattern for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009825.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Karen Rees, Louise Hartley, Nadine Flowers, Aileen Clarke, Lee Hooper, Margaret Thorogood, Saverio Stranges |
Abstract |
The Seven Countries study in the 1960s showed that populations in the Mediterranean region experienced lower cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality probably as a result of different dietary patterns. Later observational studies have confirmed the benefits of adherence to a Mediterranean dietary pattern on CVD risk factors. Clinical trial evidence is limited, and is mostly in secondary prevention. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 93 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 11 | 12% |
United Kingdom | 10 | 11% |
Spain | 9 | 10% |
Canada | 9 | 10% |
Mexico | 5 | 5% |
Australia | 3 | 3% |
France | 2 | 2% |
South Africa | 2 | 2% |
Finland | 2 | 2% |
Other | 6 | 6% |
Unknown | 34 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 61 | 66% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 25 | 27% |
Scientists | 4 | 4% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 400 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 2 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
Australia | 2 | <1% |
United States | 2 | <1% |
Spain | 2 | <1% |
Ireland | 1 | <1% |
Mexico | 1 | <1% |
Finland | 1 | <1% |
Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
Other | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 385 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 75 | 19% |
Student > Master | 72 | 18% |
Researcher | 36 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 28 | 7% |
Other | 65 | 16% |
Unknown | 95 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 134 | 34% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 51 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 38 | 10% |
Psychology | 15 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 3% |
Other | 47 | 12% |
Unknown | 104 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 150. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2023.
All research outputs
#274,101
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#456
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,872
of 209,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9
of 242 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,531 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 242 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.