↓ Skip to main content

'Mediterranean' dietary pattern for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
9 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
91 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
168 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
269 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
'Mediterranean' dietary pattern for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009825.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karen Rees, Louise Hartley, Nadine Flowers, Aileen Clarke, Lee Hooper, Margaret Thorogood, Saverio Stranges

Abstract

The Seven Countries study in the 1960s showed that populations in the Mediterranean region experienced lower cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality probably as a result of different dietary patterns. Later observational studies have confirmed the benefits of adherence to a Mediterranean dietary pattern on CVD risk factors. Clinical trial evidence is limited, and is mostly in secondary prevention.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 91 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 269 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 253 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 59 22%
Student > Master 58 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 10%
Researcher 24 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 8%
Other 50 19%
Unknown 31 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 116 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 34 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 12%
Psychology 13 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 3%
Other 28 10%
Unknown 39 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 136. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2019.
All research outputs
#120,411
of 14,207,346 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#245
of 10,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,349
of 157,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 128 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,207,346 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,887 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,074 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 128 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.