You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Progressive inner retinal neurodegeneration in non-proliferative macular telangiectasia type 2
|
---|---|
Published in |
British Journal of Ophthalmology, September 2024
|
DOI | 10.1136/bjo-2023-325115 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Alec L Amram, S Scott Whitmore, Cheryl Wang, Christine Clavell, Lance J Lyons, Alexander M Rusakevich, Ian Han, James Folk, H Culver Boldt, Edwin M Stone, Stephen R Russell, Kyungmoo Lee, Michael Abramoff, Charles Wykoff, Elliott H Sohn |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2024.
All research outputs
#3,052,443
of 26,571,932 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Ophthalmology
#457
of 6,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,878
of 152,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Ophthalmology
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,571,932 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,061 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.