↓ Skip to main content

Cancer in multi-lineage mosaic RASopathies due to pathogenic variants in HRAS or KRAS: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Cancer Research, September 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cancer in multi-lineage mosaic RASopathies due to pathogenic variants in HRAS or KRAS: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Clinical Cancer Research, September 2024
DOI 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-24-1928
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonas Windrich, Gina M. Ney, Philip S. Rosenberg, Jung Kim, Martin Zenker, Douglas R. Stewart, Christian P. Kratz

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2024.
All research outputs
#2,118,767
of 26,595,441 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Cancer Research
#1,644
of 13,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,486
of 154,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Cancer Research
#14
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,595,441 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,524 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,037 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.