↓ Skip to main content

Characterization and comparability of biosimilars: A filgrastim case of study and regulatory perspectives for Latin America

Overview of attention for article published in Electronic Journal of Biotechnology, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Characterization and comparability of biosimilars: A filgrastim case of study and regulatory perspectives for Latin America
Published in
Electronic Journal of Biotechnology, November 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.ejbt.2016.10.003
Authors

Karina Mendoza-Macedo, Alexis J. Romero-Díaz, Mariana P. Miranda-Hernández, Víctor R. Campos-García, Nancy D. Ramírez-Ibañez, L. Carmina Juárez-Bayardo, Karen Moreno-Duran, Miriam S. Cedillo-Robles, Nestor O. Pérez, Helgi Jung-Cook, Luis F. Flores-Ortiz, Emilio Medina-Rivero

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 22%
Student > Master 10 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 15%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 3 6%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 9 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 22%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 11 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2018.
All research outputs
#7,190,706
of 12,456,513 outputs
Outputs from Electronic Journal of Biotechnology
#73
of 380 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,668
of 252,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Electronic Journal of Biotechnology
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,456,513 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 380 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,300 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.