You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Abstract PO3-18-06: First-in-human phase 1A study of RGT-419B, a next generation CDK4 inhibitor, in patients (pts) with hormone receptor positive (HR+) HER2- advanced/metastatic breast cancer (ABC) who progressed on prior CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cancer Research, May 2024
|
DOI | 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs23-po3-18-06 |
Authors |
Seth Wander, Dave Valacer, Richard Zuniga, Heather Yeckes-Rodin, Christopher Perkins, Lisa Ge, Lili Yao, Jing Lin, Dawn Begley, Feifei Sun, Andie Zheng, Jing Han, Zhi (Julie) Xie, Aditya Bardia, Kevin Kalinsky |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2024.
All research outputs
#5,164,033
of 26,690,210 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Research
#4,726
of 19,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,129
of 344,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Research
#57
of 244 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,690,210 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,437 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 244 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.