The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Title |
Adductor canal block combined with genicular nerve block versus local infiltration analgesia for total knee arthroplasty: a randomized noninferiority trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, September 2024
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13018-024-05048-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Tong Mu, Baohong Yuan, Ke Wei, Qian Yang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 8 | 36% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 14% |
Philippines | 2 | 9% |
Turkey | 1 | 5% |
Canada | 1 | 5% |
Belgium | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 6 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 11 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 27% |
Scientists | 4 | 18% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2024.
All research outputs
#2,834,090
of 26,726,803 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#85
of 1,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,223
of 212,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#1
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,726,803 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,723 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,516 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.