↓ Skip to main content

Bladder cancer mortality of workers exposed to aromatic amines: an updated analysis

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Cancer, March 1991
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bladder cancer mortality of workers exposed to aromatic amines: an updated analysis
Published in
British Journal of Cancer, March 1991
DOI 10.1038/bjc.1991.106
Pubmed ID
Authors

G Piolatto, E Negri, C La Vecchia, E Pira, A Decarli, J Peto

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 3 25%
Researcher 2 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 3 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 4 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 8%
Social Sciences 1 8%
Materials Science 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2001.
All research outputs
#8,475,076
of 25,287,709 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Cancer
#5,316
of 11,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,936
of 16,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Cancer
#8
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,287,709 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,004 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 16,799 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.