↓ Skip to main content

Machineries for Making Publics: Inscribing and De-scribing Publics in Public Engagement

Overview of attention for article published in Minerva A Review of Science, Learning and Policy , September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
104 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Machineries for Making Publics: Inscribing and De-scribing Publics in Public Engagement
Published in
Minerva A Review of Science, Learning and Policy , September 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11024-010-9155-x
Authors

Ulrike Felt, Maximilian Fochler

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 7 6%
United States 3 3%
Austria 2 2%
Italy 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 101 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 29%
Researcher 27 23%
Student > Master 17 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 5%
Other 19 16%
Unknown 8 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 76 64%
Environmental Science 7 6%
Arts and Humanities 5 4%
Philosophy 3 3%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 11 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2016.
All research outputs
#2,747,303
of 11,326,849 outputs
Outputs from Minerva A Review of Science, Learning and Policy
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,651,285
of 10,661,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Minerva A Review of Science, Learning and Policy
#52
of 172 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,326,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 10,661,621 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 172 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.