↓ Skip to main content

An Evaluation of the Left-Brain vs. Right-Brain Hypothesis with Resting State Functional Connectivity Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
80 news outlets
blogs
26 blogs
twitter
1055 X users
patent
1 patent
peer_reviews
2 peer review sites
facebook
100 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
54 Google+ users
reddit
8 Redditors
video
11 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
246 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
680 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An Evaluation of the Left-Brain vs. Right-Brain Hypothesis with Resting State Functional Connectivity Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0071275
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jared A. Nielsen, Brandon A. Zielinski, Michael A. Ferguson, Janet E. Lainhart, Jeffrey S. Anderson

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,055 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 680 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 2%
United Kingdom 9 1%
Germany 4 <1%
Japan 4 <1%
Brazil 4 <1%
France 3 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Singapore 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Other 9 1%
Unknown 630 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 104 15%
Student > Bachelor 103 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 92 14%
Researcher 90 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 37 5%
Other 129 19%
Unknown 125 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 164 24%
Neuroscience 69 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 56 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 52 8%
Social Sciences 31 5%
Other 154 23%
Unknown 154 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1619. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2024.
All research outputs
#7,338
of 26,781,404 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#89
of 233,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22
of 210,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#3
of 4,710 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,781,404 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 233,986 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,426 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,710 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.