You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Muscle Stem Cells
Methods in molecular biology, January 2017
Eusebio Perdiguero, DDW Cornelison
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||8||73%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||1||9%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||6||25%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||4||17%|
|Student > Bachelor||2||8%|
|Student > Postgraduate||1||4%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||10||42%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||4||17%|
|Medicine and Dentistry||1||4%|
|Economics, Econometrics and Finance||1||4%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2019.
All research outputs
of 23,298,349 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
of 13,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 422,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
of 1,076 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,298,349 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,337 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,741 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,076 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.