↓ Skip to main content

Persistent effects of pre-Columbian plant domestication on Amazonian forest composition

Overview of attention for article published in Science, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
57 news outlets
blogs
23 blogs
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
209 X users
facebook
37 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
7 Google+ users
reddit
2 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
430 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
948 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Persistent effects of pre-Columbian plant domestication on Amazonian forest composition
Published in
Science, March 2017
DOI 10.1126/science.aal0157
Pubmed ID
Authors

C Levis, F R C Costa, F Bongers, M Peña-Claros, C R Clement, A B Junqueira, E G Neves, E K Tamanaha, F O G Figueiredo, R P Salomão, C V Castilho, W E Magnusson, O L Phillips, J E Guevara, D Sabatier, J-F Molino, D Cárdenas López, A M Mendoza, N C A Pitman, A Duque, P Núñez Vargas, C E Zartman, R Vasquez, A Andrade, J L Camargo, T R Feldpausch, S G W Laurance, W F Laurance, T J Killeen, H E Mendonça Nascimento, J C Montero, B Mostacedo, I L Amaral, I C Guimarães Vieira, R Brienen, H Castellanos, J Terborgh, M de Jesus Veiga Carim, J R da Silva Guimarães, L de Souza Coelho, F D de Almeida Matos, F Wittmann, H F Mogollón, G Damasco, N Dávila, R García-Villacorta, E N H Coronado, T Emilio, D de Andrade Lima Filho, J Schietti, P Souza, N Targhetta, J A Comiskey, B S Marimon, B-H Marimon, D Neill, A Alonso, L Arroyo, F A Carvalho, F C de Souza, F Dallmeier, M P Pansonato, J F Duivenvoorden, P V A Fine, P R Stevenson, A Araujo-Murakami, G A Aymard C, C Baraloto, D D do Amaral, J Engel, T W Henkel, P Maas, P Petronelli, J D Cardenas Revilla, J Stropp, D Daly, R Gribel, M Ríos Paredes, M Silveira, R Thomas-Caesar, T R Baker, N F da Silva, L V Ferreira, C A Peres, M R Silman, C Cerón, F C Valverde, A Di Fiore, E M Jimenez, M C Peñuela Mora, M Toledo, E M Barbosa, L C de Matos Bonates, N C Arboleda, E de Sousa Farias, A Fuentes, J-L Guillaumet, P Møller Jørgensen, Y Malhi, I P de Andrade Miranda, J F Phillips, A Prieto, A Rudas, A R Ruschel, N Silva, P von Hildebrand, V A Vos, E L Zent, S Zent, B B L Cintra, M T Nascimento, A A Oliveira, H Ramirez-Angulo, J F Ramos, G Rivas, J Schöngart, R Sierra, M Tirado, G van der Heijden, E V Torre, O Wang, K R Young, C Baider, A Cano, W Farfan-Rios, C Ferreira, B Hoffman, C Mendoza, I Mesones, A Torres-Lezama, M N U Medina, T R van Andel, D Villarroel, R Zagt, M N Alexiades, H Balslev, K Garcia-Cabrera, T Gonzales, L Hernandez, I Huamantupa-Chuquimaco, A G Manzatto, W Milliken, W P Cuenca, S Pansini, D Pauletto, F R Arevalo, N F Costa Reis, A F Sampaio, L E Urrego Giraldo, E H Valderrama Sandoval, L Valenzuela Gamarra, C I A Vela, H Ter Steege

Abstract

The extent to which pre-Columbian societies altered Amazonian landscapes is hotly debated. We performed a basin-wide analysis of pre-Columbian impacts on Amazonian forests by overlaying known archaeological sites in Amazonia with the distributions and abundances of 85 woody species domesticated by pre-Columbian peoples. Domesticated species are five times more likely than nondomesticated species to be hyperdominant. Across the basin, the relative abundance and richness of domesticated species increase in forests on and around archaeological sites. In southwestern and eastern Amazonia, distance to archaeological sites strongly influences the relative abundance and richness of domesticated species. Our analyses indicate that modern tree communities in Amazonia are structured to an important extent by a long history of plant domestication by Amazonian peoples.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 209 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 948 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 12 1%
United States 6 <1%
Chile 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 916 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 157 17%
Researcher 150 16%
Student > Master 140 15%
Student > Bachelor 88 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 75 8%
Other 174 18%
Unknown 164 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 323 34%
Environmental Science 228 24%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 41 4%
Social Sciences 39 4%
Arts and Humanities 33 3%
Other 67 7%
Unknown 217 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 766. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2024.
All research outputs
#25,828
of 25,729,842 outputs
Outputs from Science
#1,170
of 83,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#503
of 324,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#32
of 1,230 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,729,842 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,264 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,614 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,230 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.