↓ Skip to main content

Implicit bias in healthcare professionals: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Ethics, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 1,113)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
48 news outlets
blogs
13 blogs
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
220 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1481 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2065 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Implicit bias in healthcare professionals: a systematic review
Published in
BMC Medical Ethics, March 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12910-017-0179-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chloë FitzGerald, Samia Hurst

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 220 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,065 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Unknown 2063 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 274 13%
Student > Master 242 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 174 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 171 8%
Researcher 143 7%
Other 383 19%
Unknown 678 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 390 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 320 15%
Psychology 176 9%
Social Sciences 137 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 40 2%
Other 259 13%
Unknown 743 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 622. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2024.
All research outputs
#36,222
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#2
of 1,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#750
of 324,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#1
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,113 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,971 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.