↓ Skip to main content

Climate related sea-level variations over the past two millennia

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
22 news outlets
blogs
17 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
518 tweeters
googleplus
5 Google+ users
video
2 video uploaders

Citations

dimensions_citation
273 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
452 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Climate related sea-level variations over the past two millennia
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, June 2011
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1015619108
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. C. Kemp, B. P. Horton, J. P. Donnelly, M. E. Mann, M. Vermeer, S. Rahmstorf

Abstract

We present new sea-level reconstructions for the past 2100 y based on salt-marsh sedimentary sequences from the US Atlantic coast. The data from North Carolina reveal four phases of persistent sea-level change after correction for glacial isostatic adjustment. Sea level was stable from at least BC 100 until AD 950. Sea level then increased for 400 y at a rate of 0.6 mm/y, followed by a further period of stable, or slightly falling, sea level that persisted until the late 19th century. Since then, sea level has risen at an average rate of 2.1 mm/y, representing the steepest century-scale increase of the past two millennia. This rate was initiated between AD 1865 and 1892. Using an extended semiempirical modeling approach, we show that these sea-level changes are consistent with global temperature for at least the past millennium.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 518 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 452 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 18 4%
Germany 11 2%
Brazil 4 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
New Zealand 2 <1%
Jamaica 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 14 3%
Unknown 394 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 107 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 87 19%
Student > Master 60 13%
Student > Bachelor 37 8%
Professor 37 8%
Other 101 22%
Unknown 23 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 183 40%
Environmental Science 100 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 59 13%
Engineering 25 6%
Social Sciences 11 2%
Other 31 7%
Unknown 43 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 572. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2020.
All research outputs
#16,702
of 15,417,113 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#542
of 85,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,067
of 14,477,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#542
of 84,859 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,417,113 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 85,051 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 14,477,964 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84,859 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.