↓ Skip to main content

Restricting oral fluid and food intake during labour

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
94 tweeters
facebook
72 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
337 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Restricting oral fluid and food intake during labour
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003930.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mandisa Singata, Joan Tranmer, Gillian ML Gyte

Abstract

Restricting fluids and foods during labour is common practice across many birth settings with some women only being allowed sips of water or ice chips. Restriction of oral intake may be unpleasant for some women, and may adversely influence their experience of labour.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 94 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 337 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 329 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 57 17%
Student > Bachelor 56 17%
Researcher 44 13%
Student > Postgraduate 26 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 7%
Other 80 24%
Unknown 49 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 128 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 74 22%
Social Sciences 19 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 3%
Psychology 10 3%
Other 32 9%
Unknown 63 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 131. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2020.
All research outputs
#178,804
of 17,360,236 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#338
of 11,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,672
of 168,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,360,236 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,395 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.