↓ Skip to main content

Association Between C677T Polymorphism of Methylene Tetrahydrofolate Reductase and Congenital Heart Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Association Between C677T Polymorphism of Methylene Tetrahydrofolate Reductase and Congenital Heart Disease
Published in
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine, July 2013
DOI 10.1161/circgenetics.113.000191
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chrysovalanto Mamasoula, R. Reid Prentice, Tomasz Pierscionek, Faith Pangilinan, James L. Mills, Charlotte Druschel, Kenneth Pass, Mark W. Russell, Darroch Hall, Ana Töpf, Danielle L. Brown, Diana Zelenika, Jamie Bentham, Catherine Cosgrove, Shoumo Bhattacharya, Javier Granados Riveron, Kerry Setchfield, J. David Brook, Frances A. Bu’Lock, Chris Thornborough, Thahira J. Rahman, Julian Palomino Doza, Huay L. Tan, John O’Sullivan, A. Graham Stuart, Gillian Blue, David Winlaw, Alex V. Postma, Barbara J.M. Mulder, Aelko H. Zwinderman, Klaartje van Engelen, Antoon F.M. Moorman, Anita Rauch, Marc Gewillig, Jeroen Breckpot, Koen Devriendt, G. Mark Lathrop, Martin Farrall, Judith A. Goodship, Heather J. Cordell, Lawrence C. Brody, Bernard D. Keavney

Abstract

Association between the C677T polymorphism of the methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene and congenital heart disease (CHD) is contentious.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Unknown 46 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 23%
Professor 7 15%
Other 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Other 11 23%
Unknown 5 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 9 19%
Unknown 8 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2017.
All research outputs
#4,836,328
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
#372
of 1,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,150
of 209,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,062 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,341 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.