You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Review on fire effects on ectomycorrhizal symbiosis, an unachieved work for a scalding topic
Forest Ecology & Management, May 2017
Adrien Taudière, Franck Richard, Christopher Carcaillet
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||1||33%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||21||18%|
|Student > Master||19||16%|
|Student > Bachelor||16||13%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||10||8%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||46||39%|
|Earth and Planetary Sciences||6||5%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||3||3%|
|Arts and Humanities||1||<1%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2017.
All research outputs
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Forest Ecology & Management
of 5,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 312,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Forest Ecology & Management
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,269 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,006 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.