↓ Skip to main content

Non-pharmacological interventions for fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
40 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
103 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
289 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Non-pharmacological interventions for fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008322.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fiona Cramp, Sarah Hewlett, Celia Almeida, John R Kirwan, Ernest HS Choy, Trudie Chalder, Jon Pollock, Robin Christensen

Abstract

Fatigue is a common and potentially distressing symptom for people with rheumatoid arthritis with no accepted evidence based management guidelines. Non-pharmacological interventions, such as physical activity and psychosocial interventions, have been shown to help people with a range of other long-term conditions to manage subjective fatigue.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 289 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
Canada 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Sri Lanka 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Unknown 280 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 64 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 14%
Student > Bachelor 39 13%
Researcher 33 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 8%
Other 51 18%
Unknown 37 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 108 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 39 13%
Psychology 33 11%
Social Sciences 14 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 2%
Other 42 15%
Unknown 46 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2017.
All research outputs
#279,177
of 12,860,125 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#778
of 10,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,025
of 156,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,860,125 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,449 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,370 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.