You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Non‐pharmacological interventions for fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008322.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fiona Cramp, Sarah Hewlett, Celia Almeida, John R Kirwan, Ernest HS Choy, Trudie Chalder, Jon Pollock, Robin Christensen |
| Abstract |
Fatigue is a common and potentially distressing symptom for people with rheumatoid arthritis with no accepted evidence based management guidelines. Non-pharmacological interventions, such as physical activity and psychosocial interventions, have been shown to help people with a range of other long-term conditions to manage subjective fatigue. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 11 | 31% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 20% |
| United States | 2 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 3% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 77% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 9% |
| Scientists | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 566 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 557 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 103 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 68 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 65 | 11% |
| Researcher | 46 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 30 | 5% |
| Other | 96 | 17% |
| Unknown | 158 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 155 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 76 | 13% |
| Psychology | 45 | 8% |
| Sports and Recreations | 17 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 3% |
| Other | 79 | 14% |
| Unknown | 177 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2023.
All research outputs
#825,456
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,568
of 13,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,738
of 215,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#30
of 231 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,086 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 231 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.