↓ Skip to main content

Resistance training to improve type 2 diabetes: working toward a prescription for the future

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition & Metabolism, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
97 X users
facebook
8 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
286 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Resistance training to improve type 2 diabetes: working toward a prescription for the future
Published in
Nutrition & Metabolism, March 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12986-017-0173-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dominik H. Pesta, Renata L. S. Goncalves, Anila K. Madiraju, Barbara Strasser, Lauren M. Sparks

Abstract

The prevalence of type 2 diabetes (T2D) is rapidly increasing, and effective strategies to manage and prevent this disease are urgently needed. Resistance training (RT) promotes health benefits through increased skeletal muscle mass and qualitative adaptations, such as enhanced glucose transport and mitochondrial oxidative capacity. In particular, mitochondrial adaptations triggered by RT provide evidence for this type of exercise as a feasible lifestyle recommendation to combat T2D, a disease typically characterized by altered muscle mitochondrial function. Recently, the synergistic and antagonistic effects of combined training and Metformin use have come into question and warrant more in-depth prospective investigations. In the future, clinical intervention studies should elucidate the mechanisms driving RT-mitigated mitochondrial adaptations in muscle and their link to improvements in glycemic control, cholesterol metabolism and other cardiovascular disease risk factors in individuals with T2D.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 97 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 286 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 284 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 48 17%
Student > Master 41 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 10%
Researcher 21 7%
Student > Postgraduate 16 6%
Other 50 17%
Unknown 82 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 59 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 41 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 40 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 4%
Other 30 10%
Unknown 86 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 93. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2023.
All research outputs
#454,988
of 25,355,907 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition & Metabolism
#77
of 1,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,577
of 317,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition & Metabolism
#5
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,355,907 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,013 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,237 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.