↓ Skip to main content

The emerging role of dietary fructose in obesity and cognitive decline

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
14 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
537 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The emerging role of dietary fructose in obesity and cognitive decline
Published in
Nutrition Journal, August 2013
DOI 10.1186/1475-2891-12-114
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shaheen E Lakhan, Annette Kirchgessner

Abstract

The incidence of obesity has increased dramatically over the past several years, and in parallel, so has the prevalence of type 2 diabetes (T2D). Numerous studies have demonstrated that both obesity and T2D are associated with lower cognitive performance, cognitive decline, and dementia. Intake of dietary fructose has also increased. In fact, high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS) accounts for as much as 40% of caloric sweeteners used in the United States. Given the increase in the incidence of Alzheimer's disease (AD), characterized by an age-related decline in memory and cognitive functioning, in this report we review the effects of obesity on cognitive performance and the impact of high fructose intake in promoting cognitive decline. The paper then considers the effects of omega-3 fatty acids (FAs), which have been linked to promising results in cognitive function including ameliorating the impact of a high-fructose diet.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 537 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 3 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 529 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 225 42%
Student > Master 41 8%
Researcher 37 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 4%
Other 17 3%
Other 54 10%
Unknown 143 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 95 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 79 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 76 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 25 5%
Neuroscience 21 4%
Other 79 15%
Unknown 162 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 90. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2024.
All research outputs
#482,468
of 25,701,027 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#153
of 1,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,462
of 209,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#1
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,701,027 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,528 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,785 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.