Title |
Ode to positive constructive daydreaming
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2013
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00626 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Rebecca L. McMillan, Scott Barry Kaufman, Jerome L. Singer |
Abstract |
Nearly 60 years ago, Jerome L. Singer launched a groundbreaking research program into daydreaming (Singer, 1955, 1975, 2009) that presaged and laid the foundation for virtually every major strand of mind wandering research active today (Antrobus, 1999; Klinger, 1999, 2009). Here we review Singer's enormous contribution to the field, which includes insights, methodologies, and tools still in use today, and trace his enduring legacy as revealed in the recent proliferation of mind wandering studies. We then turn to the central theme in Singer's work, the adaptive nature of positive constructive daydreaming, which was a revolutionary idea when Singer began his work in the 1950s and remains underreported today. Last, we propose a new approach to answering the enduring question: Why does mind wandering persist and occupy so much of our time, as much as 50% of our waking time according to some estimates, if it is as costly as most studies suggest? |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 15 | 21% |
Canada | 4 | 6% |
France | 3 | 4% |
Ireland | 2 | 3% |
India | 2 | 3% |
Romania | 1 | 1% |
Poland | 1 | 1% |
Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
Other | 7 | 10% |
Unknown | 35 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 62 | 86% |
Scientists | 7 | 10% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 9 | 3% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Belgium | 1 | <1% |
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
Other | 4 | 1% |
Unknown | 268 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 50 | 17% |
Student > Master | 47 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 42 | 15% |
Researcher | 35 | 12% |
Other | 18 | 6% |
Other | 52 | 18% |
Unknown | 45 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 129 | 45% |
Neuroscience | 21 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 13 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 4% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 4% |
Other | 47 | 16% |
Unknown | 54 | 19% |