You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The duration of sleep promoting efficacy by dual orexin receptor antagonists is dependent upon receptor occupancy threshold
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Neuroscience, August 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2202-14-90 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Anthony L Gotter, Christopher J Winrow, Joseph Brunner, Susan L Garson, Steven V Fox, Jacquelyn Binns, Charles M Harrell, Donghui Cui, Ka Lai Yee, Mark Stiteler, Joanne Stevens, Alan Savitz, Pamela L Tannenbaum, Spencer J Tye, Terrence McDonald, Leon Yao, Scott D Kuduk, Jason Uslaner, Paul J Coleman, John J Renger |
Abstract |
Drugs targeting insomnia ideally promote sleep throughout the night, maintain normal sleep architecture, and are devoid of residual effects associated with morning sedation. These features of an ideal compound are not only dependent upon pharmacokinetics, receptor binding kinetics, potency and pharmacodynamic activity, but also upon a compound's mechanism of action. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 2% |
Japan | 1 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 77 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 20 | 25% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 9% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 6% |
Student > Master | 5 | 6% |
Other | 12 | 15% |
Unknown | 21 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 20% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 16% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 10% |
Neuroscience | 6 | 7% |
Chemistry | 3 | 4% |
Other | 10 | 12% |
Unknown | 25 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2014.
All research outputs
#3,553,537
of 22,719,618 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neuroscience
#147
of 1,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,551
of 200,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neuroscience
#3
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,719,618 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,241 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,072 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.