↓ Skip to main content

Electrotherapy for neck pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
298 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Electrotherapy for neck pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004251.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter Kroeling, Anita Gross, Nadine Graham, Stephen J Burnie, Grace Szeto, Charles H Goldsmith, Ted Haines, Mario Forget

Abstract

Neck pain is common, disabling and costly. The effectiveness of electrotherapy as a physiotherapeutic option remains unclear. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2005 and previously updated in 2009.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 298 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 3 1%
Brazil 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 285 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 65 22%
Researcher 40 13%
Student > Bachelor 38 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 31 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 10%
Other 95 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 134 45%
Unspecified 51 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 44 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 5%
Sports and Recreations 10 3%
Other 45 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2018.
All research outputs
#1,536,555
of 13,378,007 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,161
of 10,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,274
of 158,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#45
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,378,007 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,571 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.