You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dietary intervention impact on gut microbial gene richness
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nature12480 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Aurélie Cotillard, Sean P. Kennedy, Ling Chun Kong, Edi Prifti, Nicolas Pons, Emmanuelle Le Chatelier, Mathieu Almeida, Benoit Quinquis, Florence Levenez, Nathalie Galleron, Sophie Gougis, Salwa Rizkalla, Jean-Michel Batto, Pierre Renault, Joel Doré, Jean-Daniel Zucker, Karine Clément, Stanislav Dusko Ehrlich |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 97 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 17 | 18% |
| Spain | 12 | 12% |
| France | 7 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 5% |
| Australia | 4 | 4% |
| Canada | 4 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 4 | 4% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 37 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 60 | 62% |
| Scientists | 21 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,924 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 21 | 1% |
| France | 7 | <1% |
| Denmark | 6 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 4 | <1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| Japan | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| Ireland | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 21 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1851 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 383 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 325 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 251 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 196 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 109 | 6% |
| Other | 323 | 17% |
| Unknown | 337 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 511 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 297 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 281 | 15% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 107 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 69 | 4% |
| Other | 240 | 12% |
| Unknown | 419 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 196. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2023.
All research outputs
#205,472
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#12,181
of 98,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,365
of 213,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#154
of 987 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,574 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,047 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 987 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.