↓ Skip to main content

Dynamics of cortical dendritic membrane potential and spikes in freely behaving rats

Overview of attention for article published in Science, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
37 news outlets
blogs
14 blogs
twitter
129 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
20 Google+ users
reddit
2 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
109 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
474 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dynamics of cortical dendritic membrane potential and spikes in freely behaving rats
Published in
Science, March 2017
DOI 10.1126/science.aaj1497
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jason J Moore, Pascal M Ravassard, David Ho, Lavanya Acharya, Ashley L Kees, Cliff Vuong, Mayank R Mehta

Abstract

Neural activity in vivo is primarily measured using extracellular somatic spikes, which provide limited information about neural computation. Hence, it is necessary to record from neuronal dendrites, which generate dendritic action potentials (DAP) and profoundly influence neural computation and plasticity. We measured neocortical sub- and suprathreshold dendritic membrane potential (DMP) from putative distal-most dendrites using tetrodes in freely behaving rats over multiple days with a high degree of stability and sub-millisecond temporal resolution. DAP firing rates were several fold larger than somatic rates. DAP rates were modulated by subthreshold DMP fluctuations which were far larger than DAP amplitude, indicting hybrid, analog-digital coding in the dendrites. Parietal DAP and DMP exhibited egocentric spatial maps comparable to pyramidal neurons. These results have important implications for neural coding and plasticity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 129 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 474 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 2%
Japan 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 455 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 127 27%
Researcher 107 23%
Student > Master 39 8%
Student > Bachelor 33 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 5%
Other 80 17%
Unknown 66 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 158 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 119 25%
Engineering 24 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 3%
Computer Science 16 3%
Other 64 14%
Unknown 77 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 467. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2023.
All research outputs
#58,866
of 25,708,267 outputs
Outputs from Science
#2,236
of 83,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,332
of 321,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#51
of 1,240 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,708,267 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,252 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,240 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.