↓ Skip to main content

Gonadotrophins for idiopathic male factor subfertility

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gonadotrophins for idiopathic male factor subfertility
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005071.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Abdelhamid M Attia, Ahmed M Abou-Setta, Hesham G Al-Inany

Abstract

Male factors leading to subfertility account for at least half of all cases of subfertility worldwide. Although some causes of male subfertility are treatable, treatment of idiopathic male factor subfertility remains empirical. Researchers have used gonadotrophins to improve sperm parameters in idiopathic male factor subfertility with the ultimate goal of increasing birth and pregnancy rates, but results have been conflicting.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 60 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 21%
Student > Master 11 18%
Student > Bachelor 9 15%
Researcher 7 11%
Unspecified 7 11%
Other 14 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 46%
Unspecified 10 16%
Psychology 6 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Other 9 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2013.
All research outputs
#6,656,905
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,080
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,373
of 155,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#79
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,051 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.