↓ Skip to main content

The Effect of a Cardiovascular Polypill Strategy on Pill Burden

Overview of attention for article published in Cardiovascular Therapeutics, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Effect of a Cardiovascular Polypill Strategy on Pill Burden
Published in
Cardiovascular Therapeutics, November 2015
DOI 10.1111/1755-5922.12151
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Truelove, Anushka Patel, Severine Bompoint, Alex Brown, Alan Cass, Graham S. Hillis, David Peiris, Natasha Rafter, Christopher M. Reid, Anthony Rodgers, Andrew Tonkin, Tim Usherwood, Ruth Webster, the Kanyini GAP Collaboration

Abstract

Recent trials of cardiovascular polypills in high-risk populations show improvements in use of cardiovascular preventive treatments, compared to usual care. We describe patterns of pill burden in Australian practice, define the impact of polypill therapy on pill burden and explore how physicians add medication to polypill therapy. The Kanyini Guidelines Adherence with the Polypill study was an open-label trial involving 623 participants in Australia which randomised participants to a polypill strategy (containing a statin, anti-platelet agent and 2 blood pressure lowering medications) or usual care. Participants either had established cardiovascular disease or were at high calculated risk (≥ 15% over 5 years). Current medications, daily pill burden, and self-reported use of combination treatment were recorded prior to randomisation and at study end. Median pill burden at baseline and study end were compared in both arms. Subgroup analysis of the polypill strategy on trial primary outcomes was conducted by pill burden at baseline. Median total and cardiovascular pill burdens of the polypill group decreased from 7 to 5 and from 4 to 2 respectively (median change -2; IQR -3, 0) with no change in the usual care group (comparison of change; p<0.001). No change was seen for non-cardiovascular medications. Of those still using the polypill at study end, 43.8% were prescribed additional medications; 84.5% of these additional medications were blood pressure lowering medications. Within the polypill group, lower pill burden at baseline was associated with greater increases in the use of indicated cardiovascular preventive medications at study end compared to those with higher pill burdens. No trend was observed between the level of baseline pill burden and the effect of poylpill treatment on systolic blood pressure or total cholesterol. A cardiovascular polypill in contemporary Australian practice reduces cardiovascular and total pill burdens, despite frequent prescription of additional medications. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 87 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 20%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Professor 6 7%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 22 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 32%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 29 33%