You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Standard Methods for Sampling Freshwater Fishes: Opportunities for International Collaboration
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Fisheries, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1080/03632415.2017.1276352 |
| Authors |
Scott A. Bonar, Norman Mercado‐Silva, Wayne A. Hubert, T. Douglas Beard, Göran Dave, Jan Kubečka, Brian D. S. Graeb, Nigel P. Lester, Mark Porath, Ian J. Winfield |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 38% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 38% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 22% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2017.
All research outputs
#7,208,166
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Fisheries
#280
of 844 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,723
of 321,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fisheries
#14
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 844 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,177 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.