↓ Skip to main content

Psychological interventions for women with metastatic breast cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
211 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Psychological interventions for women with metastatic breast cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004253.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mohammed Mustafa, Andrew Carson-Stevens, David Gillespie, Adrian GK Edwards

Abstract

Psychological symptoms are associated with metastatic breast cancer. This is the basis for exploring the impact of psychological interventions on psychosocial and survival outcomes. One early study appeared to show significant survival and psychological benefits from psychological support while subsequent studies have revealed conflicting results. This review is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2004 and previously updated in 2007.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 207 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 58 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 17%
Researcher 23 11%
Student > Bachelor 21 10%
Unspecified 20 9%
Other 54 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 77 36%
Medicine and Dentistry 61 29%
Unspecified 21 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 10%
Social Sciences 14 7%
Other 17 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2013.
All research outputs
#6,588,025
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,997
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,137
of 154,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#75
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,880 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.