↓ Skip to main content

Physical conditioning as part of a return to work strategy to reduce sickness absence for workers with back pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
4 policy sources
twitter
7 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
105 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
545 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Physical conditioning as part of a return to work strategy to reduce sickness absence for workers with back pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001822.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frederieke G Schaafsma, Karyn Whelan, Allard J van der Beek, Ludeke C van der Es‐Lambeek, Anneli Ojajärvi, Jos H Verbeek

Abstract

Physical conditioning as part of a return to work strategy aims to improve work status for workers on sick leave due to back pain. This is the second update of a Cochrane Review (originally titled 'Work conditioning, work hardening and functional restoration for workers with back and neck pain') first published in 2003, updated in 2010, and updated again in 2013.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 545 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 543 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 97 18%
Student > Bachelor 69 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 9%
Researcher 48 9%
Student > Postgraduate 36 7%
Other 101 19%
Unknown 144 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 148 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 97 18%
Sports and Recreations 29 5%
Psychology 29 5%
Social Sciences 19 3%
Other 65 12%
Unknown 158 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,838,298
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,934
of 13,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,629
of 214,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#86
of 232 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,226 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 232 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.