↓ Skip to main content

Physical conditioning as part of a return to work strategy to reduce sickness absence for workers with back pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
14 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
394 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Physical conditioning as part of a return to work strategy to reduce sickness absence for workers with back pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001822.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frederieke G Schaafsma, Karyn Whelan, Allard J van der Beek, Ludeke C van der Es-Lambeek, Anneli Ojajärvi, Jos H Verbeek

Abstract

Physical conditioning as part of a return to work strategy aims to improve work status for workers on sick leave due to back pain. This is the second update of a Cochrane Review (originally titled 'Work conditioning, work hardening and functional restoration for workers with back and neck pain') first published in 2003, updated in 2010, and updated again in 2013.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 394 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 392 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 86 22%
Student > Bachelor 52 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 11%
Researcher 43 11%
Student > Postgraduate 33 8%
Other 75 19%
Unknown 60 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 131 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 78 20%
Psychology 27 7%
Social Sciences 19 5%
Sports and Recreations 19 5%
Other 47 12%
Unknown 73 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2020.
All research outputs
#1,664,203
of 16,450,433 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,198
of 11,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,121
of 165,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#42
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,450,433 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,490 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,298 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.