↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

Ghost of habitat past: historic habitat affects the contemporary distribution of giant garter snakes in a modified landscape

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Conservation, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Summary Twitter Wikipedia
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ghost of habitat past: historic habitat affects the contemporary distribution of giant garter snakes in a modified landscape
Published in
Animal Conservation, August 2013
DOI 10.1111/acv.12073
Authors

B. J. Halstead, G. D. Wylie, M. L. Casazza

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 4%
United States 2 4%
Sweden 1 2%
Mexico 1 2%
Latvia 1 2%
Unknown 48 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 20%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 5 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 64%
Environmental Science 11 20%
Computer Science 1 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Unknown 7 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2018.
All research outputs
#6,124,402
of 22,719,618 outputs
Outputs from Animal Conservation
#701
of 1,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,682
of 198,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Conservation
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,719,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,223 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,941 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.

This page is provided by Altmetric.