↓ Skip to main content

Phonological Similarity and Trace Degradation in the Serial Recall Task: When CAT helps RAT, but not MAN

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Psychology, October 1999
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#48 of 355)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Phonological Similarity and Trace Degradation in the Serial Recall Task: When CAT helps RAT, but not MAN
Published in
International Journal of Psychology, October 1999
DOI 10.1080/002075999399602
Authors

Anthony B. Fallon, Kim Groves, Gerald Tehan

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 5%
United Kingdom 1 3%
Portugal 1 3%
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 35 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 28%
Student > Bachelor 7 18%
Researcher 6 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 10%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 4 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 23 57%
Linguistics 3 8%
Neuroscience 3 8%
Arts and Humanities 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 5 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2017.
All research outputs
#1,120,734
of 9,183,818 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Psychology
#48
of 355 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,462
of 253,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Psychology
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 9,183,818 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 355 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,628 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.