You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Aphasia LIFT: Exploratory investigation of an intensive comprehensive aphasia programme
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Aphasiology, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1080/02687038.2013.825759 |
| Authors |
Amy D. Rodriguez, Linda Worrall, Kyla Brown, Brooke Grohn, Eril McKinnon, Charlene Pearson, Sophia Van Hees, Tracy Roxbury, Petrea Cornwell, Anna MacDonald, Anthony Angwin, Elizabeth Cardell, Bronwyn Davidson, David A. Copland |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 4 | 57% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Scientists | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 115 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 26 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 12% |
| Researcher | 12 | 10% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 13% |
| Unknown | 22 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 20% |
| Psychology | 16 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 11% |
| Linguistics | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 17 | 15% |
| Unknown | 24 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2018.
All research outputs
#5,657,890
of 22,719,618 outputs
Outputs from Aphasiology
#230
of 649 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,194
of 213,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aphasiology
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,719,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 649 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.