↓ Skip to main content

Host allometry influences the evolution of parasite host-generalism: theory and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Host allometry influences the evolution of parasite host-generalism: theory and meta-analysis
Published in
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, March 2017
DOI 10.1098/rstb.2016.0089
Pubmed ID
Authors

Josephine G. Walker, Amy Hurford, Jo Cable, Amy R. Ellison, Stephen J. Price, Clayton E. Cressler

Abstract

Parasites vary widely in the diversity of hosts they infect: some parasite species are specialists-infecting just a single host species, while others are generalists, capable of infecting many. Understanding the factors that drive parasite host-generalism is of basic biological interest, but also directly relevant to predicting disease emergence in new host species, identifying parasites that are likely to have unidentified additional hosts, and assessing transmission risk. Here, we use mathematical models to investigate how variation in host body size and environmental temperature affect the evolution of parasite host-generalism. We predict that parasites are more likely to evolve a generalist strategy when hosts are large-bodied, when variation in host body size is large, and in cooler environments. We then explore these predictions using a newly updated database of over 20 000 fish-macroparasite associations. Within the database we see some evidence supporting these predictions, but also highlight mismatches between theory and data. By combining these two approaches, we establish a theoretical basis for interpreting empirical data on parasites' host specificity and identify key areas for future work that will help untangle the drivers of parasite host-generalism.This article is part of the themed issue 'Opening the black box: re-examining the ecology and evolution of parasite transmission'.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 83 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 19%
Student > Master 13 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 14%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 14 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 51%
Environmental Science 7 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 5 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 20 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2023.
All research outputs
#2,440,511
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#2,022
of 7,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,176
of 323,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#40
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,606 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.