↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for erythropoietin‐resistant anaemia in dialysis patients

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
167 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for erythropoietin‐resistant anaemia in dialysis patients
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006861.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sunil V Badve, Elaine M Beller, Alan Cass, Daniel P Francis, Carmel Hawley, Iain C Macdougall, Vlado Perkovic, David W Johnson

Abstract

People living with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) often develop anaemia. Erythropoiesis-simulating agents (ESAs) are often given to people living with ESKD to maintain haemoglobin at a level to minimise need for transfusion. However, about 5% to 10% of patients with ESKD exhibit resistance to ESAs, and observational studies have shown that patients requiring high doses of ESA are at increased risk of mortality.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 167 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 14%
Researcher 19 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 9%
Student > Bachelor 14 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 33 20%
Unknown 52 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 8%
Psychology 7 4%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 3%
Other 20 12%
Unknown 58 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2021.
All research outputs
#8,323,707
of 26,311,549 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,378
of 13,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,507
of 213,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#171
of 228 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,311,549 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.6. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,635 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 228 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.