↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for erythropoietin-resistant anaemia in dialysis patients

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for erythropoietin-resistant anaemia in dialysis patients
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006861.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sunil V Badve, Elaine M Beller, Alan Cass, Daniel P Francis, Carmel Hawley, Iain C Macdougall, Vlado Perkovic, David W Johnson

Abstract

People living with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) often develop anaemia. Erythropoiesis-simulating agents (ESAs) are often given to people living with ESKD to maintain haemoglobin at a level to minimise need for transfusion. However, about 5% to 10% of patients with ESKD exhibit resistance to ESAs, and observational studies have shown that patients requiring high doses of ESA are at increased risk of mortality.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 114 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 16%
Student > Master 18 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 13%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Student > Postgraduate 7 6%
Other 27 24%
Unknown 17 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Psychology 6 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Other 19 17%
Unknown 22 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2013.
All research outputs
#10,024,022
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,554
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,486
of 155,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#108
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,667 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.