↓ Skip to main content

Occupational safety and health enforcement tools for preventing occupational diseases and injuries

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
29 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Occupational safety and health enforcement tools for preventing occupational diseases and injuries
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010183.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christina Mischke, Jos H Verbeek, Jenny Job, Thais C Morata, Anne Alvesalo-Kuusi, Kaisa Neuvonen, Simon Clarke, Robert I Pedlow

Abstract

There is uncertainty as to whether and what extent occupational safety and health regulation and legislation enforcement activities, such as inspections, are effective and efficient to improve workers' health and safety. We use the term regulation to refer both to regulation and legislation.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 140 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 18%
Unspecified 17 12%
Researcher 13 9%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Other 43 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 23%
Unspecified 25 17%
Social Sciences 22 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 14 10%
Other 35 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2018.
All research outputs
#598,597
of 13,441,462 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,924
of 10,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,537
of 159,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#23
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,441,462 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,596 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 159,001 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.