↓ Skip to main content

Occupational safety and health enforcement tools for preventing occupational diseases and injuries

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
19 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
298 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Occupational safety and health enforcement tools for preventing occupational diseases and injuries
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010183.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christina Mischke, Jos H Verbeek, Jenny Job, Thais C Morata, Anne Alvesalo‐Kuusi, Kaisa Neuvonen, Simon Clarke, Robert I Pedlow

Abstract

There is uncertainty as to whether and what extent occupational safety and health regulation and legislation enforcement activities, such as inspections, are effective and efficient to improve workers' health and safety. We use the term regulation to refer both to regulation and legislation.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 298 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 292 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 49 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 13%
Researcher 24 8%
Student > Postgraduate 19 6%
Student > Bachelor 16 5%
Other 62 21%
Unknown 90 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 19%
Social Sciences 30 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 16 5%
Environmental Science 15 5%
Other 50 17%
Unknown 104 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2020.
All research outputs
#1,688,641
of 26,094,193 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,454
of 13,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,188
of 213,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#72
of 229 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,094,193 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,439 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 229 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.