Title |
Uterine epithelioid leiomyosarcoma with c-kit expression and YWHAE gene rearrangement: a case report of a diagnostic pitfall of uterine sarcoma
|
---|---|
Published in |
Diagnostic Pathology, March 2017
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13000-017-0615-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Terufumi Kubo, Shintaro Sugita, Ryuichi Wada, Noriaki Kikuchi, Masahiro Iwasaki, Yumika Ito, Taro Sugawara, Hiromi Fujita, Makoto Emori, Ryoichi Tanaka, Hiroshi Hirano, Tsuyoshi Saito, Tadashi Hasegawa |
Abstract |
Uterine sarcoma is a rare tumor that is often difficult to classify based on morphological and immunohistochemical analysis alone. Limited access to molecular biological analysis in routine practice would hinder making a definitive diagnosis. In this report, we describe a case of a mesenchymal tumor arising from the uterine cervix in a 52-year-old woman. From microscopic morphology of the resected specimen, epithelioid leiomyosarcoma, high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma, or uterine gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) were considered as differential diagnoses. The immunophenotype of the tumor featured smooth muscle differentiation and hormone receptor expression. The cell membrane and cytoplasm were positive for c-kit, although no mutation was found in the c-kit or PDGFRA gene. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis revealed a relatively low frequency of YWHAE rearrangement, whereas there were few NUTM2A and NUTM2B split signals. In this case, the tumor was not typical of any three of the differential diagnoses mentioned above. However, insufficient frequency of YWHAE, NUTM2A, and NUTM2B gene rearrangement and absence of mutation in both the c-kit and PDGFRA genes suggested that this tumor should be categorized as epithelioid leiomyosarcoma. This is an instructive case showing a potential diagnostic pitfall of uterine sarcoma. Comprehensive approaches including molecular biological techniques are required for definitive diagnosis. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | 20% |
United States | 1 | 20% |
Ukraine | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 21% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 16% |
Other | 2 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 11% |
Student > Master | 2 | 11% |
Other | 3 | 16% |
Unknown | 3 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 47% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
Psychology | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 5 | 26% |