↓ Skip to main content

Fibrinogen concentrate in bleeding patients

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
104 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
154 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fibrinogen concentrate in bleeding patients
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008864.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne Wikkelsø, Jens Lunde, Mathias Johansen, Jakob Stensballe, Jørn Wetterslev, Ann Merete Møller, Arash Afshari

Abstract

Hypofibrinogenaemia is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, but the optimal treatment level, the use of preemptive treatment and the preferred source of fibrinogen remain disputed. Fibrinogen concentrate is increasingly used and recommended for bleeding with acquired haemostatic deficiencies in several countries, but evidence is lacking regarding indications, dosing, efficacy and safety.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 150 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 17%
Student > Master 23 15%
Other 19 12%
Student > Bachelor 17 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 10%
Other 53 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 90 58%
Unspecified 29 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 6%
Psychology 9 6%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Other 12 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2017.
All research outputs
#1,340,970
of 12,355,197 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,216
of 8,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,776
of 156,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#38
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,355,197 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,451 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,472 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.