↓ Skip to main content

The St. Louis African American health-heart study: methodology for the study of cardiovascular disease and depression in young-old African Americans

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The St. Louis African American health-heart study: methodology for the study of cardiovascular disease and depression in young-old African Americans
Published in
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2261-13-66
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robin R Bruchas, Lisa de las Fuentes, Robert M Carney, Joann L Reagan, Carlos Bernal-Mizrachi, Amy E Riek, Chi Charles Gu, Andrew Bierhals, Mario Schootman, Theodore K Malmstrom, Thomas E Burroughs, Phyllis K Stein, Douglas K Miller, Victor G Dávila-Román

Abstract

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a major cause of death and disability worldwide. Depression has complex bidirectional adverse associations with CAD, although the mechanisms mediating these relationships remain unclear. Compared to European Americans, African Americans (AAs) have higher rates of morbidity and mortality from CAD. Although depression is common in AAs, its role in the development and features of CAD in this group has not been well examined. This project hypothesizes that the relationships between depression and CAD can be explained by common physiological pathways and gene-environment interactions. Thus, the primary aims of this ongoing project are to: a) determine the prevalence of CAD and depression phenotypes in a population-based sample of community-dwelling older AAs; b) examine the relationships between CAD and depression phenotypes in this population; and c) evaluate genetic variants from serotoninP and inflammatory pathways to discover potential gene-depression interactions that contribute significantly to the presence of CAD in AAs.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 64 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 25%
Researcher 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 15 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 33%
Psychology 7 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 8%
Neuroscience 4 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 15 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2013.
All research outputs
#5,850,196
of 22,719,618 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
#261
of 1,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,474
of 197,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,719,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,595 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,573 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.