↓ Skip to main content

Imaging Approaches for Dementia

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Neuroradiology, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Imaging Approaches for Dementia
Published in
American Journal of Neuroradiology, December 2011
DOI 10.3174/ajnr.a2782
Pubmed ID
Authors

A.D. Murray

Abstract

Brain imaging has progressed from exclusion of rare treatable mass lesions to a specific antemortem diagnosis. MR imaging-derived hippocampal atrophy and WMH are regarded as imaging biomarkers of AD and CVD respectively. Abnormal FP-CIT SPECT or cardiac iodobenzamide SPECT is a useful supportive imaging feature in the diagnosis of DLB. Frontal and/or anterior temporal atrophy and anterior defects on molecular imaging with FDG-PET or perfusion SPECT are characteristic of FTDs. Whole-body FDG-PET may be helpful in patients with rapidly progressing "autoimmune dementias," and FLAIR and DWI are indicated in suspected CJD. A major role of imaging is in the development of new drugs and less costly biomarkers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 4%
United Kingdom 3 3%
Switzerland 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Egypt 1 1%
Unknown 85 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 16 16%
Researcher 13 13%
Student > Master 9 9%
Student > Postgraduate 8 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 8%
Other 28 29%
Unknown 15 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 64%
Neuroscience 6 6%
Engineering 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 17 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2019.
All research outputs
#13,952,148
of 23,884,093 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#2,898
of 5,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,595
of 246,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#37
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,884,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,036 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,343 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.