↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for uncomplicated biliary colic

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
193 Mendeley
Summary Wikipedia Research highlights Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for uncomplicated biliary colic
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007196.pub3
Pubmed ID
23813478
Authors

Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy, Rahul Koti, Giuseppe Fusai, Brian R Davidson

Abstract

Uncomplicated biliary colic is one of the commonest indications for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy involves several months of waiting if performed electively. However, people can develop life-threatening complications during this waiting period.

View on publisher site

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 190 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 16%
Student > Bachelor 23 12%
Researcher 21 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 10%
Other 15 8%
Other 36 19%
Unknown 49 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 99 51%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Other 17 9%
Unknown 57 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2016.
All research outputs
#6,394,617
of 22,719,618 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,212
of 12,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,165
of 194,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#194
of 298 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,719,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,468 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 298 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.

This page is provided by Altmetric.